Comparison of oscillation with three other methods for measuring nasal airways resistance

In this study we have compared the sensitivity and reproducibility of nasal airways resistance measurements made using an oscillometer, with those made by passive anterior, active anterior and active posterior rhinomanometry. Nasal airways resistance values were compared in 12 patients with rhinitis...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Respiratory medicine 1990-03, Vol.84 (2), p.101-106
Hauptverfasser: Shelton, D.M., Pertuze, J., Gleeson, M.J., Thompson, J., Denman, W.T., Goff, J., Eiser, N.M., Pride, N.B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In this study we have compared the sensitivity and reproducibility of nasal airways resistance measurements made using an oscillometer, with those made by passive anterior, active anterior and active posterior rhinomanometry. Nasal airways resistance values were compared in 12 patients with rhinitis and 15 normal subjects, of whom ten had additional measurements after a vasoconstrictor spray, oxymetazoline. The coefficients of variation of 6–8 technically satisfactory measurements were 9–19%. The decongestant effect of oxymetazoline was detected by all methods, with no decrease in reproducibility. Post vasoconstrictor nasal airways resistance fell by 28% (passive anterior), 35% (active anterior), 36% (active posterior) and 58% (oscillometry). In conclusion, the oscillation method for deriving nasal airways resistance is a useful, new, simple and noninvasive way of assessing nasal airways patency. Results compare favourably with other, more established techniques.
ISSN:0954-6111
1532-3064
DOI:10.1016/S0954-6111(08)80010-8