Combined exercise and motivation program: Effect on the compliance and level of disability of patients with chronic low back pain: A randomized controlled trial
Objective: To assess the effect of a combined exercise and motivation program on the compliance and level of disability of patients with chronic and recurrent low back pain. Design: A double-blind prospective randomized controlled trial. Setting: Physical therapy outpatient department, tertiary care...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 1998-05, Vol.79 (5), p.475-487 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective: To assess the effect of a combined exercise and motivation program on the compliance and level of disability of patients with chronic and recurrent low back pain.
Design: A double-blind prospective randomized controlled trial.
Setting: Physical therapy outpatient department, tertiary care.
Patients: Ninety-three low back pain patients were randomly assigned to either a standard exercise program (
n = 49) or a combined exercise and motivation program (
n = 44).
Interventions: Patients were prescribed 10 physical therapy sessions and were advised to continue exercising after treatment termination. The motivation program consisted of five compliance-enhancing interventions. Follow-up assessments were performed at
3
1
2
weeks, 4 months, and 12 months.
Main Outcome Measures: Disability (low back outcome score), pain intensity, physical impairment (modified Waddell score, fingertip-to-floor distance, abdominal muscle strength), working ability, motivation, and compliance.
Results: The patients in the motivation group were significantly more likely to attend their exercise therapy appointments (
p = .0005). Four and 12 months after study entry there was a significant difference in favor of the motivation group with regard to the disability score (
p = .004) and pain intensity (
p ≤ .026). At 4 months, there was a significant advantage for the motivation group in the fingertip-to-floor distance (
p = .01) and in abdominal muscle strength (
p = .018). No significant differences were found in motivation scores, self-reported compliance with long-term exercise, and modified Waddell score. In terms of working ability, there was a trend favoring the combined exercise and motivation program.
Conclusion: The combined exercise and motivation program increased the rate of attendance at scheduled physical therapy sessions, ie, short-term compliance, and reduced disability and pain levels by the 12-month follow-up. However, there was no difference between the motivation and control groups with regard to long-term exercise compliance. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0003-9993 1532-821X |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90059-4 |