Leukemia after Treatment of Ovarian Cancer or Hodgkin's Disease

To the Editor: When the results of case–control studies differ dramatically from the results of large cohort studies, it is important to keep in mind the fundamental differences in methods that affect the reliability of their inferences. In the case–control method, the relative risk of disease resul...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The New England journal of medicine 1990-06, Vol.322 (25), p.1818-1820
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To the Editor: When the results of case–control studies differ dramatically from the results of large cohort studies, it is important to keep in mind the fundamental differences in methods that affect the reliability of their inferences. In the case–control method, the relative risk of disease resulting from exposure to a hypothetical cause must be estimated indirectly. Furthermore, because samples for comparison are selected retrospectively in case–control studies, there is less assurance than in cohort studies that case patients and controls do not differ except in their exposure to the hypothetical cause. Even though they are clinically relevant, the matching . . .
ISSN:0028-4793
1533-4406
DOI:10.1056/NEJM199006213222514