Evaluating evaluation : assessment of the American board of internal medicine resident evaluation form

The American Board of Internal Medicine suggests use of a standard form to rate residents on nine dimensions (such as clinical judgment and overall clinical competence) on a scale of 1 to 9. The authors examined the psychometric evidence for reliability and validity of 1,039 ratings of 85 residents...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of general internal medicine 1990-05, Vol.5 (3), p.214-217
Hauptverfasser: THOMPSON, W. G, LIPKIN, M, GILBERT, D. A, GUZZO, R. A, ROBERSON, L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The American Board of Internal Medicine suggests use of a standard form to rate residents on nine dimensions (such as clinical judgment and overall clinical competence) on a scale of 1 to 9. The authors examined the psychometric evidence for reliability and validity of 1,039 ratings of 85 residents by 135 attendings in a single internal medicine residency program. Of these ratings, 95.6% were from 6 to 9. Factor analysis revealed that high correlations among the nine dimensions (r ranged from 0.72 to 0.92) resulted from a single global factor accounting for 86% of the variance. The study also examined whether the form reliably distinguishes among residents scoring between 6 and 9. Agreement among attendings rating the same individual was weak (average reliability = 0.64, by the method of James). The rating method fails to discriminate dimensions of clinical care and has low reliability for distinguishing among competent residents.
ISSN:0884-8734
1525-1497
DOI:10.1007/BF02600537