Comparison of four commercially available 81Rb- 81mKr generators: Quality testing using a breathing lung phantom
Four commercially available 81Rb- 81mKr generators, including their elution systems, were compared. Considerable differences in useful output between the various generators were found. When a standardized elution system was used, the differences became much less. Differences in the tubing and inaccu...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of radiation applications and instrumentation. Part B, Nuclear medicine and biology Nuclear medicine and biology, 1990, Vol.17 (3), p.269-272 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 272 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 269 |
| container_title | International journal of radiation applications and instrumentation. Part B, Nuclear medicine and biology |
| container_volume | 17 |
| creator | Camps, Johannes A.J. Blokland, Jacobus A.K. Blok, Dik Pauwels, Ernest K.J. |
| description | Four commercially available
81Rb-
81mKr generators, including their elution systems, were compared. Considerable differences in useful output between the various generators were found. When a standardized elution system was used, the differences became much less. Differences in the tubing and inaccuracy of the flow meters were found to be the major causes of the original differences. The user should be aware of a loss of output that may occur when the generator is eluted with dry air. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0883-2897(90)90051-2 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79774888</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0883289790900512</els_id><sourcerecordid>79774888</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1821-cef72b93a8584c8e37c54a80ca2c86b1fe565a5100dd88bf38ac985ce888b8293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtr3DAQgHVISdI0_6ABHUpJD04k-TXuIRCWPkIDIaU9i7E8TlRky5XswP77ytllj72MNJpvhuETY--luJJCVtcCIM8UNPVlIz41QpQyU0fs9PB8wt7G-EcIBUVZH7NjlRdSgTxl08YPEwYb_ch9z3u_BG78MFAwFp3bcnxB67B1xEH-bLMUhx-BP9FIAWcf4mf-uKCz85bPFGc7PvElrhF5Gwjn5_XulhSmZxxnP7xjb3p0kc735xn7_fXLr8337P7h293m9j4zEpTMDPW1apscoYTCAOW1KQsEYVAZqFrZU1mVWEohug6g7XNA00BpCFIGqsnP2Mfd3Cn4v0taTQ82GnIOR_JL1HVT10WCE1jsQBN8jIF6PQU7YNhqKfQqV68W9WpRN0K_ytUqtV3s5y_tQN2haW821T_s6xgNuj7gaGw8YOkbqlpWCbvZYZRcvFgKOhpLo6HOBjKz7rz9_x7_AIO4mEw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79774888</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of four commercially available 81Rb- 81mKr generators: Quality testing using a breathing lung phantom</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Camps, Johannes A.J. ; Blokland, Jacobus A.K. ; Blok, Dik ; Pauwels, Ernest K.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Camps, Johannes A.J. ; Blokland, Jacobus A.K. ; Blok, Dik ; Pauwels, Ernest K.J.</creatorcontrib><description>Four commercially available
81Rb-
81mKr generators, including their elution systems, were compared. Considerable differences in useful output between the various generators were found. When a standardized elution system was used, the differences became much less. Differences in the tubing and inaccuracy of the flow meters were found to be the major causes of the original differences. The user should be aware of a loss of output that may occur when the generator is eluted with dry air.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0883-2897</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0883-2897(90)90051-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2341281</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NMBIEO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Krypton Radioisotopes ; Lung - diagnostic imaging ; Medical sciences ; Models, Structural ; Quality Assurance, Health Care ; Radionuclide Generators - standards ; Radionuclide Imaging ; Rubidium Radioisotopes</subject><ispartof>International journal of radiation applications and instrumentation. Part B, Nuclear medicine and biology, 1990, Vol.17 (3), p.269-272</ispartof><rights>1990</rights><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1821-cef72b93a8584c8e37c54a80ca2c86b1fe565a5100dd88bf38ac985ce888b8293</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=4576716$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2341281$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Camps, Johannes A.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blokland, Jacobus A.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blok, Dik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pauwels, Ernest K.J.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of four commercially available 81Rb- 81mKr generators: Quality testing using a breathing lung phantom</title><title>International journal of radiation applications and instrumentation. Part B, Nuclear medicine and biology</title><addtitle>Int J Rad Appl Instrum B</addtitle><description>Four commercially available
81Rb-
81mKr generators, including their elution systems, were compared. Considerable differences in useful output between the various generators were found. When a standardized elution system was used, the differences became much less. Differences in the tubing and inaccuracy of the flow meters were found to be the major causes of the original differences. The user should be aware of a loss of output that may occur when the generator is eluted with dry air.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Krypton Radioisotopes</subject><subject>Lung - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Models, Structural</subject><subject>Quality Assurance, Health Care</subject><subject>Radionuclide Generators - standards</subject><subject>Radionuclide Imaging</subject><subject>Rubidium Radioisotopes</subject><issn>0883-2897</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtr3DAQgHVISdI0_6ABHUpJD04k-TXuIRCWPkIDIaU9i7E8TlRky5XswP77ytllj72MNJpvhuETY--luJJCVtcCIM8UNPVlIz41QpQyU0fs9PB8wt7G-EcIBUVZH7NjlRdSgTxl08YPEwYb_ch9z3u_BG78MFAwFp3bcnxB67B1xEH-bLMUhx-BP9FIAWcf4mf-uKCz85bPFGc7PvElrhF5Gwjn5_XulhSmZxxnP7xjb3p0kc735xn7_fXLr8337P7h293m9j4zEpTMDPW1apscoYTCAOW1KQsEYVAZqFrZU1mVWEohug6g7XNA00BpCFIGqsnP2Mfd3Cn4v0taTQ82GnIOR_JL1HVT10WCE1jsQBN8jIF6PQU7YNhqKfQqV68W9WpRN0K_ytUqtV3s5y_tQN2haW821T_s6xgNuj7gaGw8YOkbqlpWCbvZYZRcvFgKOhpLo6HOBjKz7rz9_x7_AIO4mEw</recordid><startdate>1990</startdate><enddate>1990</enddate><creator>Camps, Johannes A.J.</creator><creator>Blokland, Jacobus A.K.</creator><creator>Blok, Dik</creator><creator>Pauwels, Ernest K.J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Pergamon</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1990</creationdate><title>Comparison of four commercially available 81Rb- 81mKr generators: Quality testing using a breathing lung phantom</title><author>Camps, Johannes A.J. ; Blokland, Jacobus A.K. ; Blok, Dik ; Pauwels, Ernest K.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1821-cef72b93a8584c8e37c54a80ca2c86b1fe565a5100dd88bf38ac985ce888b8293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Krypton Radioisotopes</topic><topic>Lung - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Models, Structural</topic><topic>Quality Assurance, Health Care</topic><topic>Radionuclide Generators - standards</topic><topic>Radionuclide Imaging</topic><topic>Rubidium Radioisotopes</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Camps, Johannes A.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blokland, Jacobus A.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blok, Dik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pauwels, Ernest K.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of radiation applications and instrumentation. Part B, Nuclear medicine and biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Camps, Johannes A.J.</au><au>Blokland, Jacobus A.K.</au><au>Blok, Dik</au><au>Pauwels, Ernest K.J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of four commercially available 81Rb- 81mKr generators: Quality testing using a breathing lung phantom</atitle><jtitle>International journal of radiation applications and instrumentation. Part B, Nuclear medicine and biology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Rad Appl Instrum B</addtitle><date>1990</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>269</spage><epage>272</epage><pages>269-272</pages><issn>0883-2897</issn><coden>NMBIEO</coden><abstract>Four commercially available
81Rb-
81mKr generators, including their elution systems, were compared. Considerable differences in useful output between the various generators were found. When a standardized elution system was used, the differences became much less. Differences in the tubing and inaccuracy of the flow meters were found to be the major causes of the original differences. The user should be aware of a loss of output that may occur when the generator is eluted with dry air.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>2341281</pmid><doi>10.1016/0883-2897(90)90051-2</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0883-2897 |
| ispartof | International journal of radiation applications and instrumentation. Part B, Nuclear medicine and biology, 1990, Vol.17 (3), p.269-272 |
| issn | 0883-2897 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79774888 |
| source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Biological and medical sciences Humans Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Krypton Radioisotopes Lung - diagnostic imaging Medical sciences Models, Structural Quality Assurance, Health Care Radionuclide Generators - standards Radionuclide Imaging Rubidium Radioisotopes |
| title | Comparison of four commercially available 81Rb- 81mKr generators: Quality testing using a breathing lung phantom |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T11%3A55%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20four%20commercially%20available%2081Rb-%2081mKr%20generators:%20Quality%20testing%20using%20a%20breathing%20lung%20phantom&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20radiation%20applications%20and%20instrumentation.%20Part%20B,%20Nuclear%20medicine%20and%20biology&rft.au=Camps,%20Johannes%20A.J.&rft.date=1990&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=269&rft.epage=272&rft.pages=269-272&rft.issn=0883-2897&rft.coden=NMBIEO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0883-2897(90)90051-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79774888%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79774888&rft_id=info:pmid/2341281&rft_els_id=0883289790900512&rfr_iscdi=true |