Revisions of endoprosthetic reconstructions after limb salvage in musculoskeletal oncology

Of 91 limb-salvage procedures using prosthetic reconstructions because of primary or metastatic bone and soft-tissue tumors 26 revisions were performed in 16 patients. Revision was due to polyethylene wear (9 cases), aseptic loosening (8 cases), recurrent hip dislocation (3 cases), prosthetic stem f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery 1998-02, Vol.117 (3), p.125-131
Hauptverfasser: RENARD, A. J. S, VETH, R. P. H, SCHREUDER, H. W. B, SCHRAFFORDT KOOPS, H, VAN HORN, J, KELLER, A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Of 91 limb-salvage procedures using prosthetic reconstructions because of primary or metastatic bone and soft-tissue tumors 26 revisions were performed in 16 patients. Revision was due to polyethylene wear (9 cases), aseptic loosening (8 cases), recurrent hip dislocation (3 cases), prosthetic stem fracture (2 cases), infection (2 cases), leg length discrepancy (1 case), and traumatic dislocation of a saddle prosthesis (1 case). The follow-up period for tumor control varied from 1.5 to 22 years with a median of 13.5 years. The follow-up period after the last revision operation varied from 0.5 to 12 years with a median of 3 years. At the last follow-up, the functional results had deteriorated compared with after the primary operation in 5 patients and had improved in 2 patients. In the remaining patients, the results did not change.
ISSN:0936-8051
1434-3916
DOI:10.1007/s004020050211