Comparison of pneumoperitoneum and abdominal wall lifting as to hemodynamics and surgical stress response during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Impairments in hemodynamics during pneumoperitoneum (PP) have been noted. This study compared changes in hemodynamics and surgical stress response with PP and abdominal wall lifting (AWL) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Twenty patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis were assigned to PP (n...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgical endoscopy 1998-02, Vol.12 (2), p.124-128
Hauptverfasser: NINOMIYA, K, KITANO, S, YOSHIDA, T, BANDOH, T, BAATAR, D, MATSUMOTO, T
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Impairments in hemodynamics during pneumoperitoneum (PP) have been noted. This study compared changes in hemodynamics and surgical stress response with PP and abdominal wall lifting (AWL) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Twenty patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis were assigned to PP (n = 10) or AWL (n = 10). Cardiac output (CO), stroke volume (SV), and ejection fraction (%EF) were measured by transesophageal echocardiography. Clearances of para-aminohippurate (CPAH) and sodium thiosulfate (CSTS) were determined as measures of renal function. Levels of interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, white cell count, and neutrophil elastase were evaluated as indicators of surgical stress. In the PP group, CO, SV, and %EF were depressed significantly during pneumoperitoneum. Immediately after and 15 min after insufflation, the CPAH and CSTS were decreased by 78.0% and 73.8%, respectively. None of the hemodynamic parameters changed significantly in the AWL group. Surgical stress response was not different significantly between the two groups. In contrast to pneumoperitoneum, AWL did not alter cardiac function or renal hemodynamics. AWL may be useful in patients with cardiovascular or renal disorders.
ISSN:0930-2794
1432-2218
DOI:10.1007/s004649900611