Clobetasol dipropionate 0.05% versus testosterone propionate 2% topical application for severe vulvar lichen sclerosus

OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to evaluate short-term (3 months) and long-term (1 year) treatment of vulvar lichen sclerosus, by comparing topical application of testosterone propionate 2% in petrolatum with the corticosteroid clobetasol dipropionate 0.05%. STUDY DESIGN: There were 20 women in each treatme...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 1998, Vol.178 (1), p.80-84
Hauptverfasser: Bornstein, Jacob, Heifetz, Sigal, Kellner, Yehudith, Stolar, Zmira, Abramovici, Haim
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to evaluate short-term (3 months) and long-term (1 year) treatment of vulvar lichen sclerosus, by comparing topical application of testosterone propionate 2% in petrolatum with the corticosteroid clobetasol dipropionate 0.05%. STUDY DESIGN: There were 20 women in each treatment group. The patients' symptoms and the gynecologist's examination findings were recorded before treatment, at 3 months, and at 1 year after initiation of therapy. RESULTS: The symptomatic (subjective) effect of clobetasol treatment was similar to that of testosterone at the 3-month follow-up (p ≤ 0.34), although objectively the signs of lichen sclerosus had improved more in the clobetasol group (p ≤ 0.033). Both symptoms and signs were significantly more improved in the clobetasol-treated group at the 1-year follow-up examination (p ≤ 0.02). Seventy percent of women treated by testosterone discontinued treatment because of a lack of response, whereas only 10% of the women treated with clobetasol stopped the treatment for that reason (p ≤ 0.00042). CONCLUSIONS: Clobetasol is more effective than testosterone in the treatment of women with lichen sclerosus, especially in the long term. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;178:80-4.)
ISSN:0002-9378
1097-6868
DOI:10.1016/S0002-9378(98)70631-3