Anteroposterior skeletal and dental changes after early Class II treatment with bionators and headgear

In this study we examined anteroposterior cephalometric changes in children enrolled in a randomized controlled trial of early treatment for Class II malocclusion. Children, aged 9.6 ± 0.8 years at the start of study, were randomly assigned to control (n = 81), bionator (n = 78), and headgear/bitepl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics 1998, Vol.113 (1), p.40-50
Hauptverfasser: Keeling, Stephen D., Wheeler, Timothy T., King, Gregory J., Garvan, Cynthia W., Cohen, David A., Cabassa, Salvatore, McGorray, Susan P., Taylor, Marie G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In this study we examined anteroposterior cephalometric changes in children enrolled in a randomized controlled trial of early treatment for Class II malocclusion. Children, aged 9.6 ± 0.8 years at the start of study, were randomly assigned to control (n = 81), bionator (n = 78), and headgear/biteplane (n = 90) treatments. Cephalograms were obtained initially, after Class I molars were obtained or 2 years had elapsed, after an additional 6 months during which treated subjects were randomized to retention or no retention and after a final 6 months without appliances. Calibrated examiners, blinded to group, used Johnston's analysis to measure anteroposterior cephalometric changes. Statistical analysis was used to determine annual skeletal and dental changes during treatment, retention, and follow-up, and overall. Our data reveal that both bionator and head-gear treatments corrected Class II molar relationships, reduced overjets and apical base discrepancies, and caused posterior maxillary tooth movement. The skeletal changes, largely attributable to enhanced mandibular growth in both headgear and bionator subjects, were stable a year after the end of treatment, but dental movements relapsed.(Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:50)
ISSN:0889-5406
1097-6752
DOI:10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70275-6