Ascites in cirrhosis: A medical or surgical problem?

Fifty‐seven cirrhotic patients with intractable ascites had a portosystemic shunt. In 35 patients, a peritoneovenous shunt had previously failed. Forty‐six patients were in Pugh's class B and 11 were in class C. There were three operative deaths (5.3%). Fifty‐three (98.2%) of the 54 survivors w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) Md.), 1990-02, Vol.11 (2), p.323-325
1. Verfasser: Shear, Leroy
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Fifty‐seven cirrhotic patients with intractable ascites had a portosystemic shunt. In 35 patients, a peritoneovenous shunt had previously failed. Forty‐six patients were in Pugh's class B and 11 were in class C. There were three operative deaths (5.3%). Fifty‐three (98.2%) of the 54 survivors were cleared of ascites. In one patient, ascites persisted because of postshunt heart failure that resulted in a marked increase of caval pressure. Twenty‐seven patients (50%) had late encephalopathy, which was severe and disabling in 12 (22%). One‐and three‐year survival rates were 72% and 36%, respectively. These results suggest that although portosystemic shunts are remarkably effective in dealing with ascites, the high rate of postoperative encephalopathy is a strong argument against their routine use in the management of intractable ascites in cirrhosis.
ISSN:0270-9139
1527-3350
DOI:10.1002/hep.1840110226