OH-radical formation by ultrasound in aqueous solution – Part II: Terephthalate and Fricke dosimetry and the influence of various conditions on the sonolytic yield

Terephthalate and Fricke dosimetry have been carried out to determine the sonolytic energy yields of the OH free radical and of its recombination product H 2O 2 in aqueous solutions under various operating conditions (nature of operating gas, power, frequency, temperature). For example, in the sonol...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ultrasonics sonochemistry 1998-06, Vol.5 (2), p.41-52
Hauptverfasser: Mark, Gertraud, Tauber, Armin, Laupert, Rüdiger, Schuchmann, Heinz-Peter, Schulz, Dorothea, Mues, Andreas, von Sonntag, Clemens
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Terephthalate and Fricke dosimetry have been carried out to determine the sonolytic energy yields of the OH free radical and of its recombination product H 2O 2 in aqueous solutions under various operating conditions (nature of operating gas, power, frequency, temperature). For example, in the sonolysis of Ar-saturated terephthalate solutions at room temperature, a frequency of 321 kHz, and a power of 170 W kg −1, the total yield [ G( ·OH)+2 G(H 2O 2)], equals 16×10 −10 mol J −1. This represents the total of ·OH that reach the liquid phase from gas phase of the cavitating bubble. The higher the solute concentration, the lower the H 2O 2 production as more of the OH free radicals are scavenged, in competition with their recombination. Fricke dosimetry, in the absence and presence of Cu 2+ ions, shows that the yield of H atom reaching the liquid phase is much lower, with G(H ·) of the order of 3×10 −10 mol J −1. These sonolytic yields are smaller in solutions that are at the point of gas saturation, and increase to an optimum as the initial sonication-induced degassing and effervescence subsides. The probing of the sonic field has shown that the rate of sonolytic free-radical formation may vary across the sonicated volume depending on frequency and power input.
ISSN:1350-4177
1873-2828
DOI:10.1016/S1350-4177(98)00012-1