Clinical Validity of a Normal Perfusion Lung Scan in Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism

The objective of this study was to test the safety of withholding anticoagulant therapy in patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism who have normal perfusion lung scans, regardless of the clinical manifestations. Anticoagulant therapy was withheld or withdrawn in 515 consecutive patient...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chest 1990-01, Vol.97 (1), p.23-26
Hauptverfasser: Hull, Russell D., Raskob, Gary E., Coates, Geoffrey, Panju, Akbar A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The objective of this study was to test the safety of withholding anticoagulant therapy in patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism who have normal perfusion lung scans, regardless of the clinical manifestations. Anticoagulant therapy was withheld or withdrawn in 515 consecutive patients except in patients in whom deep-vein thrombosis was detected. Only three of the 515 patients had symptomatic venous thromboembolism on follow-up. The frequency of symptomatic pulmonary embolism on follow-up was one of 515 patients. With knowledge of the normal findings by perfusion scanning, an alternative diagnosis was established in 367 of the 515 patients. Cause of symptoms remained uncertain in 148 patients. It is safe to withhold anticoagulant therapy in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism and normal perfusion scans, regardless of the clinical manifestations. The finding of a normal perfusion scan excludes the presence of clinically important pulmonary embolism and makes pulmonary angiography unnecessary. (Chest 1990; 97:23-26)
ISSN:0012-3692
1931-3543
DOI:10.1378/chest.97.1.23