Non-invasive measurement of cardiac output : whole-body impedance cardiography in simultaneous comparison with thermodilution and direct oxygen Fick methods

To determine the reliability of whole-body impedance cardiography (ICGWB), with electrodes attached to wrists and ankles, in the measurement of cardiac output (CO) on the basis of simultaneous comparison with thermodilution (TD) and direct oxygen Fick (Fick) methods. Prospective clinical study. A su...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Intensive care medicine 1997-11, Vol.23 (11), p.1132-1137
Hauptverfasser: KÖÖBI, T, KAUKINEN, S, AHOLA, T, TURJANMAA, V. M. H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To determine the reliability of whole-body impedance cardiography (ICGWB), with electrodes attached to wrists and ankles, in the measurement of cardiac output (CO) on the basis of simultaneous comparison with thermodilution (TD) and direct oxygen Fick (Fick) methods. Prospective clinical study. A surgical intensive care unit at a university hospital. Thirty consecutive subjects undergoing a coronary artery bypass surgery were investigated preoperatively. ICGWB derived CO was measured simultaneously with the TD and Fick methods to establish the biases and limits of agreement (LA) between the methods. The results obtained by ICGWB and the invasive methods showed good agreement. The bias and LA between COTD and COICG were 0.00 l/min: 1.37 and 1.37 l/min, respectively, and were close to those obtained between COTD and COFICK, 0.32 l/min; 1.74 and -1.10 l/min. The bias and LA between the COFICK and COICG were -0.32 l/min; -2.24 and 1.60 l/min respectively. The repeatability value of consecutive single measurements for ICGWB (RVICG = 0.57 l/min) was much better than for the TD method (RVTD = 1.10 l/min). There was close agreement between the results of the three methods in the measurement of CO. In sedated preoperative patients the accuracy of ICGWB is within clinically acceptable limits and its repeatability is excellent. ICGWB provides a useful alternative to the TD and Fick methods in cases where the pressures supplied by the pulmonary artery catheter are not essential.
ISSN:0342-4642
1432-1238
DOI:10.1007/s001340050469