Informed consent for a prescription drug: Impact of disclosed information on patient understanding and medical outcomes

Based on the two legal standards of informed consent currently in use, the Medical Practice Standard and the Reasonable Person Standard, two disclosures containing information about the risks and benefits of the anticonvulsant, Carbamazepine, were empirically derived. One of these two disclosures wa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Patient education and counseling 1990-06, Vol.15 (3), p.249-259
Hauptverfasser: Quaid, Kimberly A., Faden, Ruth R., Vining, Eileen P., Freeman, John M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Based on the two legal standards of informed consent currently in use, the Medical Practice Standard and the Reasonable Person Standard, two disclosures containing information about the risks and benefits of the anticonvulsant, Carbamazepine, were empirically derived. One of these two disclosures was randomly given to a sample of 39 seizure patients and the parents of pediatric seizure patients prescribed this drug. Subjects were interviewed either immediately after disclosure and at followup, or at followup only. The results provide no evidence for the hypothesized negative effects — anxiety, treatment refusal, reduced compliance and increased side effects — of providing patients with extensive disclosures about prescription drugs.
ISSN:0738-3991
1873-5134
DOI:10.1016/0738-3991(90)90100-Y