The Semantics of Diagnosis and Management of Genitourinary Infections: A Cross-Specialty Study

Timpka T and Bjurulf P. The semantics of diagnosis and management of genitourinary infections: a cross-specialty study. Family Practice 1989; 6: 279–285. To investigate agreement between physicians about diagnosis and management concepts of genitourinary infection, data from 63 symptomatic women was...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Family practice 1989-12, Vol.6 (4), p.279-285
Hauptverfasser: TIMPKA, TOOMAS, BJURULF, PER
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Timpka T and Bjurulf P. The semantics of diagnosis and management of genitourinary infections: a cross-specialty study. Family Practice 1989; 6: 279–285. To investigate agreement between physicians about diagnosis and management concepts of genitourinary infection, data from 63 symptomatic women was collected and distributed to a panel consisting of three general practitioners, three urologists and three nephrologists. Using double-blind methods, the panel was asked individually to give a preliminary diagnosis and a management recommendation for each case. Pairwise comparison of the evaluations showed 66% agreement for diagnosis and 79% agreement for prescription of antibiotics. Adjusting for chance agreement, the kappa index was 0.43 for prescription of antibiotics, 0.31 for diagnosis of cystitis, 0.20 for vulvovaginitis, 0.21 for pyelonephritis and 0.09 for urethritis. The specialist groups ordered significantly more laboratory investigations, resulting in a 75–95% more expensive work-up compared with general practitioners. The findings imply a need for more distinct use of the concept of ‘urethritis’ and are consistent with previously demonstrated differences in resource use between general practitioners and specialist physicians.
ISSN:0263-2136
1460-2229
DOI:10.1093/fampra/6.4.279