Antigen- versus antibody-immobilized ELISA procedures based on a biotinyl-estradiol conjugate
A biotinyl-6α-estradiol derivative (Bio-E 2) was synthesized and used as the key component in antigen- and antibody-immobilized ELISA techniques, and the relative merits of the two methods were compared. A precise and reproducible antigen-immobilization was achieved in avidin-coated microtiter plate...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of steroid biochemistry 1989-12, Vol.33 (6), p.1161-1166 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | A biotinyl-6α-estradiol derivative (Bio-E
2) was synthesized and used as the key component in antigen- and antibody-immobilized ELISA techniques, and the relative merits of the two methods were compared. A precise and reproducible antigen-immobilization was achieved in avidin-coated microtiter plates with Bio-E
2. This assay, when completed by the incubation with primary antibody and second antibody-peroxidase conjugate, has a very low detection limit (6 pg/ml estradiol) but required a long incubation time with primary antibody to reach equilibrium. At non-equilibrium conditions, using a high antibody concentration, the assay could be very fast and sensitive. In the antibody-immobilized assay, the Bio-E
2 was added to compete with the estradiol present in the calibrator or sample and visualized with a streptavidin-peroxidase conjugate. The detection limit is higher (34 pg/ml), but the specificity was superior and the incubation time to reach equilibrium shorter as compared to the antigen-immobilized assay. Therefore, the antibody-immobilized assay appeared to be ideal for the classical ELISA technique, whereas the antigen-immobilized method seemed to be best suited for automated assay systems using antibody in excess. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-4731 |
DOI: | 10.1016/0022-4731(89)90425-1 |