Intramuscular pressures during exercise Comparison of measurements with and without infusion
Our objective was to compare two techniques for measuring intramuscular pressures during dynamic exercise. In 20 volunteers muscle contraction and relaxation pressures were recorded with a noninfusion method (slit catheter) and with a microcapillary infusion method (Myopress catheter). Relaxation pr...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Acta orthopaedica 1989, Vol.60 (5), p.593-596 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 596 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 593 |
| container_title | Acta orthopaedica |
| container_volume | 60 |
| creator | Styf, Jorma R. Crenshaw, Albert Hargens, Alan R. |
| description | Our objective was to compare two techniques for measuring intramuscular pressures during dynamic exercise. In 20 volunteers muscle contraction and relaxation pressures were recorded with a noninfusion method (slit catheter) and with a microcapillary infusion method (Myopress catheter). Relaxation pressures measured by noninfusion were higher than those measured by infusion. The dynamic properties of the infusion method were higher as compared with the noninfusion method. The dynamic properties of the noninfusion method increased when microcapillary infusion was connected. This resulted in a lower recording of the muscle-relaxation pressure than without infusion. We concluded that the microcapiliary infusion technique and the design of the lip of the Myopress catheter are better suited for pressure recordings during exercise. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3109/17453678909150129 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79403010</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79403010</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-fde3d2e15cb5c36b5685d6d96489c63ef3a3a20f5f066b9fa6dd327e94ab60873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFq3DAQhkVpSdKkD9BDQYfS27aSZY8tkktZmjYQ6CW5BcxYGmUdbGkjWaR5-3izm4VQyEUaNN8_jD7GPkvxXUmhf8i6rBTUjRZaVkIW-h072rwtFDTF-31dl4fsY0p3Qqim1OKAHRQgFEBxxG4u_BRxzMnkASNfR0opzwe3Ofb-ltM_iqZPxJdhXGPsU_A8OD4SbrCR_JT4Qz-tOHr7XIQ88d67nPrgT9gHh0OiT7v7mF2f_7pa_llc_v19sfx5uTBlraaFs6RsQbIyXWUUdBU0lQWroWy0AUVOocJCuMoJgE47BGtVUZMusQPR1OqYfdvOXcdwnylN7dgnQ8OAnkJOba1LoYQUMyi3oIkhpUiuXcd-xPjYStFujLb_GZ0zX3bDczeS3Sd2Cuf-110fk8HBRfSzsD0GUAtQMGNnW2yWE-KIDyEOtp3wcQjxJaPe2uL0VXxFOEwrg5Hau5Cjn_W-8YcnFF2lOg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79403010</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intramuscular pressures during exercise Comparison of measurements with and without infusion</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Styf, Jorma R. ; Crenshaw, Albert ; Hargens, Alan R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Styf, Jorma R. ; Crenshaw, Albert ; Hargens, Alan R.</creatorcontrib><description>Our objective was to compare two techniques for measuring intramuscular pressures during dynamic exercise. In 20 volunteers muscle contraction and relaxation pressures were recorded with a noninfusion method (slit catheter) and with a microcapillary infusion method (Myopress catheter). Relaxation pressures measured by noninfusion were higher than those measured by infusion. The dynamic properties of the infusion method were higher as compared with the noninfusion method. The dynamic properties of the noninfusion method increased when microcapillary infusion was connected. This resulted in a lower recording of the muscle-relaxation pressure than without infusion. We concluded that the microcapiliary infusion technique and the design of the lip of the Myopress catheter are better suited for pressure recordings during exercise.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1745-3674</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0001-6470</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-3682</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3109/17453678909150129</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2603662</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AOSAAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basingstoke: Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Catheterization ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Male ; Manometry - methods ; Middle Aged ; Muscle Contraction - physiology ; Muscles - physiology ; Pain - etiology ; Periostitis - physiopathology ; Physical Exertion - physiology ; Pressure ; Space life sciences ; Striated muscle. Tendons ; Vertebrates: osteoarticular system, musculoskeletal system</subject><ispartof>Acta orthopaedica, 1989, Vol.60 (5), p.593-596</ispartof><rights>1989 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 1989</rights><rights>1990 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-fde3d2e15cb5c36b5685d6d96489c63ef3a3a20f5f066b9fa6dd327e94ab60873</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-fde3d2e15cb5c36b5685d6d96489c63ef3a3a20f5f066b9fa6dd327e94ab60873</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,4025,27928,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=6670636$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2603662$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Styf, Jorma R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crenshaw, Albert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hargens, Alan R.</creatorcontrib><title>Intramuscular pressures during exercise Comparison of measurements with and without infusion</title><title>Acta orthopaedica</title><addtitle>Acta Orthop Scand</addtitle><description>Our objective was to compare two techniques for measuring intramuscular pressures during dynamic exercise. In 20 volunteers muscle contraction and relaxation pressures were recorded with a noninfusion method (slit catheter) and with a microcapillary infusion method (Myopress catheter). Relaxation pressures measured by noninfusion were higher than those measured by infusion. The dynamic properties of the infusion method were higher as compared with the noninfusion method. The dynamic properties of the noninfusion method increased when microcapillary infusion was connected. This resulted in a lower recording of the muscle-relaxation pressure than without infusion. We concluded that the microcapiliary infusion technique and the design of the lip of the Myopress catheter are better suited for pressure recordings during exercise.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Catheterization</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Manometry - methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Muscle Contraction - physiology</subject><subject>Muscles - physiology</subject><subject>Pain - etiology</subject><subject>Periostitis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Physical Exertion - physiology</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Space life sciences</subject><subject>Striated muscle. Tendons</subject><subject>Vertebrates: osteoarticular system, musculoskeletal system</subject><issn>1745-3674</issn><issn>0001-6470</issn><issn>1745-3682</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFq3DAQhkVpSdKkD9BDQYfS27aSZY8tkktZmjYQ6CW5BcxYGmUdbGkjWaR5-3izm4VQyEUaNN8_jD7GPkvxXUmhf8i6rBTUjRZaVkIW-h072rwtFDTF-31dl4fsY0p3Qqim1OKAHRQgFEBxxG4u_BRxzMnkASNfR0opzwe3Ofb-ltM_iqZPxJdhXGPsU_A8OD4SbrCR_JT4Qz-tOHr7XIQ88d67nPrgT9gHh0OiT7v7mF2f_7pa_llc_v19sfx5uTBlraaFs6RsQbIyXWUUdBU0lQWroWy0AUVOocJCuMoJgE47BGtVUZMusQPR1OqYfdvOXcdwnylN7dgnQ8OAnkJOba1LoYQUMyi3oIkhpUiuXcd-xPjYStFujLb_GZ0zX3bDczeS3Sd2Cuf-110fk8HBRfSzsD0GUAtQMGNnW2yWE-KIDyEOtp3wcQjxJaPe2uL0VXxFOEwrg5Hau5Cjn_W-8YcnFF2lOg</recordid><startdate>1989</startdate><enddate>1989</enddate><creator>Styf, Jorma R.</creator><creator>Crenshaw, Albert</creator><creator>Hargens, Alan R.</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1989</creationdate><title>Intramuscular pressures during exercise Comparison of measurements with and without infusion</title><author>Styf, Jorma R. ; Crenshaw, Albert ; Hargens, Alan R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-fde3d2e15cb5c36b5685d6d96489c63ef3a3a20f5f066b9fa6dd327e94ab60873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Catheterization</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Manometry - methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Muscle Contraction - physiology</topic><topic>Muscles - physiology</topic><topic>Pain - etiology</topic><topic>Periostitis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Physical Exertion - physiology</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Space life sciences</topic><topic>Striated muscle. Tendons</topic><topic>Vertebrates: osteoarticular system, musculoskeletal system</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Styf, Jorma R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crenshaw, Albert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hargens, Alan R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta orthopaedica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Styf, Jorma R.</au><au>Crenshaw, Albert</au><au>Hargens, Alan R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intramuscular pressures during exercise Comparison of measurements with and without infusion</atitle><jtitle>Acta orthopaedica</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Orthop Scand</addtitle><date>1989</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>593</spage><epage>596</epage><pages>593-596</pages><issn>1745-3674</issn><issn>0001-6470</issn><eissn>1745-3682</eissn><coden>AOSAAK</coden><abstract>Our objective was to compare two techniques for measuring intramuscular pressures during dynamic exercise. In 20 volunteers muscle contraction and relaxation pressures were recorded with a noninfusion method (slit catheter) and with a microcapillary infusion method (Myopress catheter). Relaxation pressures measured by noninfusion were higher than those measured by infusion. The dynamic properties of the infusion method were higher as compared with the noninfusion method. The dynamic properties of the noninfusion method increased when microcapillary infusion was connected. This resulted in a lower recording of the muscle-relaxation pressure than without infusion. We concluded that the microcapiliary infusion technique and the design of the lip of the Myopress catheter are better suited for pressure recordings during exercise.</abstract><cop>Basingstoke</cop><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><pmid>2603662</pmid><doi>10.3109/17453678909150129</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1745-3674 |
| ispartof | Acta orthopaedica, 1989, Vol.60 (5), p.593-596 |
| issn | 1745-3674 0001-6470 1745-3682 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79403010 |
| source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Adolescent Adult Biological and medical sciences Catheterization Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Male Manometry - methods Middle Aged Muscle Contraction - physiology Muscles - physiology Pain - etiology Periostitis - physiopathology Physical Exertion - physiology Pressure Space life sciences Striated muscle. Tendons Vertebrates: osteoarticular system, musculoskeletal system |
| title | Intramuscular pressures during exercise Comparison of measurements with and without infusion |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T03%3A37%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intramuscular%20pressures%20during%20exercise%20Comparison%20of%20measurements%20with%20and%20without%20infusion&rft.jtitle=Acta%20orthopaedica&rft.au=Styf,%20Jorma%20R.&rft.date=1989&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=593&rft.epage=596&rft.pages=593-596&rft.issn=1745-3674&rft.eissn=1745-3682&rft.coden=AOSAAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.3109/17453678909150129&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E79403010%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79403010&rft_id=info:pmid/2603662&rfr_iscdi=true |