Intramuscular pressures during exercise Comparison of measurements with and without infusion

Our objective was to compare two techniques for measuring intramuscular pressures during dynamic exercise. In 20 volunteers muscle contraction and relaxation pressures were recorded with a noninfusion method (slit catheter) and with a microcapillary infusion method (Myopress catheter). Relaxation pr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta orthopaedica 1989, Vol.60 (5), p.593-596
Hauptverfasser: Styf, Jorma R., Crenshaw, Albert, Hargens, Alan R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Our objective was to compare two techniques for measuring intramuscular pressures during dynamic exercise. In 20 volunteers muscle contraction and relaxation pressures were recorded with a noninfusion method (slit catheter) and with a microcapillary infusion method (Myopress catheter). Relaxation pressures measured by noninfusion were higher than those measured by infusion. The dynamic properties of the infusion method were higher as compared with the noninfusion method. The dynamic properties of the noninfusion method increased when microcapillary infusion was connected. This resulted in a lower recording of the muscle-relaxation pressure than without infusion. We concluded that the microcapiliary infusion technique and the design of the lip of the Myopress catheter are better suited for pressure recordings during exercise.
ISSN:1745-3674
0001-6470
1745-3682
DOI:10.3109/17453678909150129