Insulin resistance is not a major determinant of low-density lipoprotein particle size
The relationship between low-density lipoprotein (LDL) peak particle diameter and insulin sensitivity, very—low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) + intermediate-density lipoprotein (LDL) triglyceride, cholesterol, and apoprotein B, postprandial lipemia, and LDL + high-density lipoprotein (HDL) triglyceride...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Metabolism, clinical and experimental clinical and experimental, 1997-11, Vol.46 (11), p.1275-1280 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The relationship between low-density lipoprotein (LDL) peak particle diameter and insulin sensitivity, very—low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) + intermediate-density lipoprotein (LDL) triglyceride, cholesterol, and apoprotein B, postprandial lipemia, and LDL + high-density lipoprotein (HDL) triglyceride was assessed. The subjects were 101 healthy males aged 15 to 45 years. Sixty-one subjects (60.4%) were offspring of a parent with coronary artery disease before age 60, and 40 subjects (39.6%) had no parental history of coronary artery disease. LDL peak particle diameter was measured following polyacrylamide gradient gel electrophoresis. An insulin sensitivity index (S
i) was determined from a frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test using a minimal modeling method. A fat tolerance test was performed with a test meal containing 70 g/m
2 fat, with triglyceride concentrations measured hourly for 12 hours. LDL peak particle diameter was significantly correlated with body mass index (BMI) (
r = −.282,
P < .01), waist to hip ratio (
r = −.291,
P < .01), fasting triglyceride (logarithmically [log] transformed) (
r = −.556,
P < .001), area under the postprandial triglyceride (log transformed) (
r = −.562,
P < .001), VLDL + IDLL triglyceride (log transformed) (
r = −.321,
P < .001), LDL + HDLL triglyceride (log transformed) (
r = .583,
P < .001), and HDL cholesterol (
r = .347,
P < .001), but there was no significant correlation with S
i. Using stepwise regression analysis, LDL + HDL triglyceride showed the strongest relationship to LDL peak particle diameter, accounting for 34% of the variation in size. S
I was not an independent predictor of LDL particle size. In conclusion, insulin sensitivity appears to have little influence on LDL particle size. The importance of LDL + HDL triglyceride should be ocnsidered a preliminary finding warranting varification in this and other populations. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0026-0495 1532-8600 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0026-0495(97)90230-4 |