Isolated upright gastroesophageal reflux is not a contraindication for antireflux surgery

Background . Patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease who reflux only in the upright position are thought to have a less severe abnormality. Controversy exists over whether these patients should be considered candidates for antireflux surgery. Methods . A total of 224 consecutive patients with...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgery 1997-10, Vol.122 (4), p.829-835
Hauptverfasser: Fein, Martin, Hagen, Jeffrey A, Ritter, Manfred P, DeMeester, Tom R, De Vos, Michaela, Bremner, Cedric G, Peters, Jeffrey H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background . Patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease who reflux only in the upright position are thought to have a less severe abnormality. Controversy exists over whether these patients should be considered candidates for antireflux surgery. Methods . A total of 224 consecutive patients with increased esophageal acid exposure on 24-hour pH monitoring were classified as having upright (n = 54), supine (n = 72), or bipositional (n = 98) reflux and were evaluated by manometry and endoscopy. Of these, 116 patients had a laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Their clinical outcome at a median of 12 months (range 4 to 44 months) was compared. Results . Patients with upright reflux had a lower prevalence of a structurally defective lower esophageal sphincter, fewer hiatal hernias, and less esophageal injury when compared to those with bipositional reflux (p < 0.005). Excellent (asymptomatic) or good outcome (minor symptoms not requiring acid suppression therapy) was achieved in 86% of the patients with upright reflux, 90% of those with supine reflux, and 89% of those with bipositional reflux. Conclusions . Patients with upright reflux have less complicated, earlier disease and have results equivalent to those patients with supine and bipositional reflux after antireflux surgery.
ISSN:0039-6060
1532-7361
DOI:10.1016/S0039-6060(97)90094-5