Automated Perimetry, Tonometry, and Questionnaire in Glaucoma Screening

To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of various portions of the glaucoma screening process, 145 participants underwent complete ophthalmic examinations. A weighted questionnaire was 20% (2 patients) and 36% (5 suspects) sensitive for the glaucoma patients and glaucoma suspects, respectively....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of ophthalmology 1989-11, Vol.108 (5), p.505-508
Hauptverfasser: Mundorf, Thomas K., Zimmerman, Thorn J., Nardin, George F., Kendall, Kenyon S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of various portions of the glaucoma screening process, 145 participants underwent complete ophthalmic examinations. A weighted questionnaire was 20% (2 patients) and 36% (5 suspects) sensitive for the glaucoma patients and glaucoma suspects, respectively. Tonometry alone was 20% (2 patients) and 7% (1 suspect) sensitive for glaucoma patients and glaucoma suspects, respectively. Automated perimetry of the central 30 degrees and nasal periphery identified nine (90%) of the glaucoma patients and five (36%) of the glaucoma suspects. The presence of increased intraocular pressure was not by itself very useful, but when perimetry or tonometry was used, 10 (100%) of the glaucoma group was identified. We recommend that automated suprathreshold perimetry and tonometry be performed in glaucoma screening.
ISSN:0002-9394
1879-1891
DOI:10.1016/0002-9394(89)90425-X