Survival analysis with unreliable endpoints

There exists a current interest in the application of survival analysis methodology to evaluate differences in latencies of response to psychological or psychopharmacological treatment modalities. However, unreliability in the measurement of treatment responses in such research poses a problem. Two...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of psychiatric research 1997-05, Vol.31 (3), p.383-392
Hauptverfasser: Overall, John E., Atlas, Robert S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:There exists a current interest in the application of survival analysis methodology to evaluate differences in latencies of response to psychological or psychopharmacological treatment modalities. However, unreliability in the measurement of treatment responses in such research poses a problem. Two methods of defining the “discrete endpoint” that is required for survival analysis are compared regarding power of tests of significance for differences in survival curves. Discrete endpoints defined by regression equations fitted to all available data for each subject provided greater power when entered into survival analysis than did endpoints dependent only on individual measurements. While this may not surprise statisticians, no examples of the use of regression estimates for survival analysis endpoints have been identified in reports of previous clinical trials nor in discussions concerning potential applications of survival analysis methodology in psychiatric research.
ISSN:0022-3956
1879-1379
DOI:10.1016/S0022-3956(97)00005-8