Fetal male masculinization in control and prenatally stressed rats

The present experiments were designed to test the hypothesis that males in utero masculinize the development of other males. This effect was examined during fetal development in males from control and prenatally stressed rats. A code identified the number of cervical‐flanking males between the targe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Developmental psychobiology 1989-11, Vol.22 (7), p.707-716
Hauptverfasser: Lephart, E. D., Fleming, D. E., Rhees, R. W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The present experiments were designed to test the hypothesis that males in utero masculinize the development of other males. This effect was examined during fetal development in males from control and prenatally stressed rats. A code identified the number of cervical‐flanking males between the target male and the cervical end of the uterus. The male parameters morphology (anogenital distance) and body, adrenal, and testis weights were recorded on the eighteenth and twentieth gestational days and categorized by the cervical‐flanking male classificantion. At Day 18, control fetuses with two cervical‐flanking males in utero displayed significantly greater anogenital distance values than did males with no cervical‐flanking male. At Day 20, control fetuses with two cervical‐flanking males had testicular weights significantly greater than those of fetuses with one or zero cervical positioned male. Prenatal stress markedly impaired male fetal development, at gestational Days 18 and 20 while suppressing the cervical‐flanking male effect. These results confirm and extend previous data that indicate: (a) prenatal stress disrupts normal fetal development, resulting in long‐term changes; and (b) androgens via a cervical‐flanking blood‐flow mechanism influence littermate morphology and sexual development during the prenatal period. Our findings also demonstrate that a general masculinizing effect could not be made across the measured male parameters since the effect of males positioned at the cervical‐flanking region in utero appears to be dependent upon maternal sources of variance. Finally, androgens prenatally have an apparent positive interaction with somatic growth.
ISSN:0012-1630
1098-2302
DOI:10.1002/dev.420220705