Prevention of urinary retention after general surgery: a controlled trial of carbachol/diazepam versus alfusozine

Background: Postoperative urinary retention is a common complication after surgical procedures. It can cause bladder dilatation, infection, and even sepsis. Carbachol/diazepam and alfusozine have been reported to lower the incidence of postoperative urinary retention, but no study showed the benefit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American College of Surgeons 1997-09, Vol.185 (3), p.234-236
Hauptverfasser: Burger, Desiree H.C, Kappetein, A.Pieter, Boutkan, Herman, Breslau, Paul J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: Postoperative urinary retention is a common complication after surgical procedures. It can cause bladder dilatation, infection, and even sepsis. Carbachol/diazepam and alfusozine have been reported to lower the incidence of postoperative urinary retention, but no study showed the benefits of these drugs in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Study Design: We used a double blind, placebo-controlled trial in which 249 patients with postoperative urinary retention were randomly assigned to receive carbachol/diazepam (n = 72), alfusozine (n = 82), or placebo (n = 95). The primary endpoint was miction within 2 hours after taking the medication. Results: There was no significant difference in miction frequency after taking the medication among the three groups (p = 0.31). The miction rate was 60% for patients in the alfusozine group, 61% in the carbachol/diazepam group, and 51% in the placebo group. Conclusions: Alfusozine and carbachol/diazepam had no apparent benefit on the incidence of postoperative urinary retention.
ISSN:1072-7515
1879-1190
DOI:10.1016/S1072-7515(01)00921-8