Prevention of urinary retention after general surgery: a controlled trial of carbachol/diazepam versus alfusozine
Background: Postoperative urinary retention is a common complication after surgical procedures. It can cause bladder dilatation, infection, and even sepsis. Carbachol/diazepam and alfusozine have been reported to lower the incidence of postoperative urinary retention, but no study showed the benefit...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American College of Surgeons 1997-09, Vol.185 (3), p.234-236 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background:
Postoperative urinary retention is a common complication after surgical procedures. It can cause bladder dilatation, infection, and even sepsis. Carbachol/diazepam and alfusozine have been reported to lower the incidence of postoperative urinary retention, but no study showed the benefits of these drugs in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
Study Design:
We used a double blind, placebo-controlled trial in which 249 patients with postoperative urinary retention were randomly assigned to receive carbachol/diazepam (n = 72), alfusozine (n = 82), or placebo (n = 95). The primary endpoint was miction within 2 hours after taking the medication.
Results:
There was no significant difference in miction frequency after taking the medication among the three groups (p = 0.31). The miction rate was 60% for patients in the alfusozine group, 61% in the carbachol/diazepam group, and 51% in the placebo group.
Conclusions:
Alfusozine and carbachol/diazepam had no apparent benefit on the incidence of postoperative urinary retention. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1072-7515 1879-1190 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S1072-7515(01)00921-8 |