Diagnostic reliability of M-mode echocardiography for detecting mitral valve prolapse in 50 consecutive panic patients

Fifty consecutive panic patients had M-mode echocardiographs read independently by two cardiologists with expertise in echocardiography. In this prospective study, there was poor interrater reliability (22 of 50; K = 0.11) for diagnosis of mitral valve prolapse (MVP). On repeat evaluation 10 months...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Comprehensive psychiatry 1989-09, Vol.30 (5), p.369-375
Hauptverfasser: Dager, Stephen R., Comess, Keith A., Saal, A.Kim, Sisk, Eric J., Beach, Kirk W., Dunner, David L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Fifty consecutive panic patients had M-mode echocardiographs read independently by two cardiologists with expertise in echocardiography. In this prospective study, there was poor interrater reliability (22 of 50; K = 0.11) for diagnosis of mitral valve prolapse (MVP). On repeat evaluation 10 months later there was also unacceptable intrarater reliability for each reader: 22 of 35 (K = 0.41) and 22 of 35 (K = 0.45). We conclude that M-mode echocardiography is clinically unreliable for establishing the diagnosis of mitral valve prolapse. These findings suggest that the variable reporting of M-mode-determined mitral valve prolapse in psychiatric populations may reflect differences among echocardiologists rather than differences in cardiac pathology. The clinical implications of these findings are discussed.
ISSN:0010-440X
1532-8384
DOI:10.1016/0010-440X(89)90002-3