The effect of intravenous ketorolac given intraoperatively versus postoperatively on outcome from gynecologic abdominal surgery

Study Objectives: To examine the effect of timing of an intravenous (IV) dose (intraoperative vs. postoperative) of ketorolac tromethamine on pain scores and overall outcome after total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) and myomectomy. Design: Prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Patients:...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical anesthesia 1997-08, Vol.9 (5), p.358-364
Hauptverfasser: Balestrieri, Philip, Simmons, Gary, Hill, Douglas, Brown, Jean, Jackson, Alice, Brull, Sorin J., Maneatis, Thomas J., Shefrin, Arna, Bynum, Lincoln, O'Hara, Dorene A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Study Objectives: To examine the effect of timing of an intravenous (IV) dose (intraoperative vs. postoperative) of ketorolac tromethamine on pain scores and overall outcome after total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) and myomectomy. Design: Prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Patients: 248 ASA physical status I and II adult female patients scheduled for elective hysterectomy or myomectomy. Interventions: General anesthesia was administered that consisted of thiopental sodium for induction, enflurane or isoflurane in nitrous oxide-oxygen for maintenance, and small doses of fentanyl and midazolam. Patients were randomized into three groups to receive toradol/placebo on a dosing schedule of dose 1 given one-half hour prior to expected end of surgery, dose 2 given on awakening in the postanesthesia care unit, and doses 3, 4, and 5 given at 6, 12, and 18 hours, respectively, after dose 2; Group 1 patients received placebo (saline) for dose 1, ketorolac 60 mg IV for dose 2, and ketorolac 30 mg IV for doses 3, 4, and 5. Group 2 patients received ketorolac 60 mg IV for dose 1, placebo for dose 2, and ketorolac 30 mg IV for doses 3, 4, and 5. Group 3 patients received placebo for all doses. All patients were given IV morphine PCA postoperatively, and morphine usages, visual analog pain intensity (VAS) scores, as well as adverse events and median times to recovery milestones were recorded. Measurements and Main Results: VAS scores (mean) before dose 2 were significantly lower in Group 2 than Group 1, as were at-rest evaluations at 15 minutes and one hour. Group 2 patients also had decreased morphine requirements as compared to placebo. Both ketorolac groups (Groups 1 and 2) had significantly higher values for patient and observer overall ratings, ease of nursing care, and tolerability as compared to placebo (Group 3). There were no significant differences among groups in adverse events or median times to recovery milestones. Conclusions: Although it is possible to demonstrate an improvement in early postoperative pain scores with intraoperative ketorolac and better overall ratings of ketorolac both intraoperatively and postoperatively as compared with placebo, the lack of clinically significant differences in analgesic efficacy in the two active study groups indicates the need for a careful consideration by the clinician of the risks versus benefits involved in the administration of antiplatelet medication in the perioperative period.
ISSN:0952-8180
1873-4529
DOI:10.1016/S0952-8180(97)00062-7