Monoaminergic and gabaergic terminations in phrenic nucleus of rat identified by immunohistochemical labeling

The termination patterns of axons in the phrenic nucleus immunoreactive to synthetic enzymes for catecholamines and for serotonin and GABA were studied in rats. Spinal cord tissue in which phrenic motoneurons were retrogradely labeled with horseradish peroxidase was incubated with antisera against d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neuroscience 1989, Vol.31 (1), p.105-113
Hauptverfasser: Zhan, W.-Z., Ellenberger, H.H., Feldman, J.L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The termination patterns of axons in the phrenic nucleus immunoreactive to synthetic enzymes for catecholamines and for serotonin and GABA were studied in rats. Spinal cord tissue in which phrenic motoneurons were retrogradely labeled with horseradish peroxidase was incubated with antisera against dopamine β-hydroxylase, phenylethanolamine- N-methyltransferase, 5-hydroxytryptamine, and GABA to identify presumptive terminations of monoaminergic and GABAergic neurons onto identified phrenic motoneurons. In the C3 to C5 spinal cord, 5-hydroxytryptamine-, dopamine β-hydroxylase- and GABA-like positive terminals with varicosities formed a dense network, with presumptive synaptic contacts on dendrites and somas of phrenic motoneurons. A similar pattern of terminations was also observed in adjacent (non-respiratory muscle) motoneuron pools. There were fewer phenylethanolamine- N-methyltransferase-positive terminal arborizations in the cervical spinal cord compared to thoracic spinal cord; phenylethanolamine- N-methyltransferase terminals were not seen in the vicinity of phrenic motoneurons. These results suggest that phrenic motoneuronal activity is influenced by multiple supraspinal inputs utilizing different neurotransmitters. These transmitters also mediate inputs to other (nearby) spinal motoneurons and thus are not unique for signal transmission to phrenic motoneurons.
ISSN:0306-4522
1873-7544
DOI:10.1016/0306-4522(89)90033-X