Determination of false negative rate in fine-needle aspiration of prostate: Study of sequential aspirations in 30 untreated carcinoma patients
Despite several studies comparing the diagnostic, accuracy of core needle biopsy and fine-needle aspiration (FNA) in the diagnosis of prostatic adenocareinoma, no clear picture of the false negative rate for FNA is available. We studied 101 follow-up FNA evaluations in 30 patients with untreated wel...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) N.J.), 1989-08, Vol.34 (2), p.73-75 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Despite several studies comparing the diagnostic, accuracy of core needle biopsy and fine-needle aspiration (FNA) in the diagnosis of prostatic adenocareinoma, no clear picture of the false negative rate for FNA is available. We studied 101 follow-up FNA evaluations in 30 patients with untreated well-differentiated carcinoma. The patients were followed for a median of two years and seven months and had from two to seven FNA follow-up evaluations (median = 2.5 evaluations per patient). If three inadequate evaluations are omitted, the combined rate of positive plus suspicious FNA biopsies was 92.9 percent (88.8 % plus 4.1 %, respectively). The residual false negative rate was 7.1 percent. The clinical features and follow-up data are described. A semiquantitative definition of “suspicious for malignancy” is suggested. We conclude that in experienced hands. FNA is a highly efficacious method for the diagnosis of prostatic adenocarcinoma. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0090-4295 1527-9995 |
DOI: | 10.1016/0090-4295(89)90166-0 |