Selective inhibitors of neuronal nitric oxide synthase – is no NOS really good NOS for the nervous system?

It is now ten years since NO was shown to account for the biological activity of endothelium-derived relaxing factor (EDRF). It is also the tenth anniversary of the identification of l- N G monomethyl arginine (l-NMMA) as the very first inhibitor of NO biosynthesis. That EDRF and NO were one and the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Trends in pharmacological sciences (Regular ed.) 1997-06, Vol.18 (6), p.204-211
Hauptverfasser: Moore, P.K., Handy, R.L.C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:It is now ten years since NO was shown to account for the biological activity of endothelium-derived relaxing factor (EDRF). It is also the tenth anniversary of the identification of l- N G monomethyl arginine (l-NMMA) as the very first inhibitor of NO biosynthesis. That EDRF and NO were one and the same sparked an explosion of interest in the biochemistry and pharmacology of NO which has yet to subside. In contrast, the first ever nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitor slipped seamlessly into the literature virtually without comment at the time. Over the following decade, l-NMMA (and like NOS inhibitors) have proved invaluable as tools for probing the biological roles of NO in health and disease and, in particular, have increased our understanding of the function of NO in the nervous system. Further advances in this important area now require the development of inhibitors selective for the neuronal isoform of NOS (nNOS). Here, Philip Moore and Rachel Handy provide an up-to-date account of the literature regarding the biochemical and pharmacological characterization of NOS inhibitors with particular reference to compounds with greater selectivity for the nNOS isoform.
ISSN:0165-6147
1873-3735
DOI:10.1016/S0165-6147(97)01064-X