Growth hormone (GH) assays: influence of standard preparations, GH isoforms, assay characteristics, and GH-binding protein

The impact of the adoption of the new biosynthetic growth hormone (GH) WHO International Reference Preparation (IRP 88/624), and the recommendation to report results in microgram/L instead of mU/L, is described. Conversion factors were determined by comparing both the linear and nonlinear relations...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical chemistry (Baltimore, Md.) Md.), 1997-06, Vol.43 (6), p.950-956
Hauptverfasser: Jansson, Chatarina, Boguszewski, Cesar, Rosberg, Sten, Carlsson, Lena, Albertsson-Wikland, Kerstin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The impact of the adoption of the new biosynthetic growth hormone (GH) WHO International Reference Preparation (IRP 88/624), and the recommendation to report results in microgram/L instead of mU/L, is described. Conversion factors were determined by comparing both the linear and nonlinear relations of the GH values. The Pharmacia polyclonal IRMA (p-IRMA) and the DELFIA monoclonal time-resolved immunofluorometric assay (trIFMA) with kit calibrators calibrated either against the pituitary-derived WHO IRP 80/505 or the new 88/624 were evaluated. Conversion factors of 4.17 mU/L = 1 microgram/L for the p-IRMA and 4.31 mU/L = 1 microgram/L for the trIFMA were necessary. Different cross-reactivity patterns for the deaminated and dimer 22-kDa, 20-kDa, and 17-kDa GH isoforms were found. Expected GH recovery was similar when the measured values were adjusted according to the results of the cross-reactivity study.
ISSN:0009-9147
1530-8561
DOI:10.1093/clinchem/43.6.950