Sexual abuse of english boys and girls: The importance of anal examination

Child sexual abuse is attracting increasing attention in the United Kingdom. In Leeds this is reflected in the work of two pediatricians who receive multiagency, direct referrals for children of all ages. Over two years 1,368 referrals were received for all kinds of abuse and neglect, including 608...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Child abuse & neglect 1989, Vol.13 (2), p.195-210
Hauptverfasser: Hobbs, C.J, Wynne, J.M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Child sexual abuse is attracting increasing attention in the United Kingdom. In Leeds this is reflected in the work of two pediatricians who receive multiagency, direct referrals for children of all ages. Over two years 1,368 referrals were received for all kinds of abuse and neglect, including 608 for suspected sexual abuse (Hobbs & Wynne, 1987a), of which 337 (243 girls, 94 boys) were confirmed or probable cases. The abuses included genital touching, masturbation, oral, vaginal and anal penetration. Of these abuses, 30% (which were frequently multiple) involved anal penetration by finger or penis; and 42% of 337 children exhibited one or more anal findings, rising to 60% of 115 children in the 0–5 years of age group. The diagnosis of abuse was made from results of multidisciplinary assessment including medical examination. Genital findings were present in 3% of boys and 50% of girls. Anal findings included erythema; swelling (tyre); laxity; shortening or eversion; reflex anal dilatation (dilatation); fissures; venous congestion; reversible and permanent skin changes; twitching; funnelling; hematoma and bruising; as well as signs of infection. The pattern of anal signs varied with the age of the child and chronicity of abuse, as judged from the history. Healing and resolution of anal physical findings on follow-up were observed from days to months after initial examination. The general absence of these findings in the group of children judged not to have been sexually abused supports a cause and effect hypothesis, but further research is required. Medical examination of every child where symptoms, signs, or situation raise the possibility of abuse or neglect must include anal inspection, but instrumental or digital examination is not recommended. En Grande-Bretagne, on prête une attention grandissante au problème des sévices sexuels à l'égard d'enfants. A Leeds, 2 pédiatres en particulier consacrent leur activité à des enfants de tout âge qui leur sont adressés directement par des entités administratives variées. Sur une période de 2 ans, ces pédiatres se sont vus référer 1,368 enfants pour toutes sortes de sévices et de négligence. Parmi eux, 608 cas avaient été soupçonnés de sévices sexuels dont 337 purent être classés comme confirmés ou comme probables (243 filles, 94 garçons). Ces sévices comprenaient des attouchements génitaux, de la masturbation et des exemples de pénétration orale, vaginale et anale. Le 30% de ces sévices (souvent répétés) comprena
ISSN:0145-2134
1873-7757
DOI:10.1016/0145-2134(89)90006-9