Evaluation of an enzyme immunochromatography method for carbamazepine: a comparison with enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique, fluorescence polarization immunoassay, and high-performance liquid chromatography

A noninstrumented enzyme immunochromatography (EIC) method for monitoring carbamazepine using whole blood was compared to the enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique (EMIT), fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA), and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Samples from 74 patients were...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Therapeutic drug monitoring 1989, Vol.11 (4), p.471-476
Hauptverfasser: OLES, K. S, PENRY, J. K, DYER, R. D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A noninstrumented enzyme immunochromatography (EIC) method for monitoring carbamazepine using whole blood was compared to the enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique (EMIT), fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA), and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Samples from 74 patients were evaluated in the comparison study, yielding correlation coefficients of 0.961 (EMIT), 0.974 (FPIA), and 0.867 (HPLC). The EIC method produced within-run coefficients of variation of 4.3%, 4.9%, and 5.8% for three carbamazepine concentrations. The between-run coefficient of variation over 107 days was 4.9%. The spiked serum sample analysis yielded recovery rates ranging from 98 to 102%. Enzyme immunochromatography was found to be a useful noninstrumented method for on-site testing. The test gives quantitative patient sample results comparable to the results obtained using established laboratory methods.
ISSN:0163-4356
1536-3694
DOI:10.1097/00007691-198907000-00016