A scoring system for the prediction of successful delivery in low-risk birthing units
Objective: To establish and test the effectiveness of a lowrisk scoring system to predict obstetric outcome for the selection of women suitable for confinement in low-intervention units. Methods: Retrospective analyses were performed on data from 2900 women enrolled in the Western Australian Pregnan...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953) 1997-05, Vol.89 (5), p.654-659 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective: To establish and test the effectiveness of a lowrisk scoring system to predict obstetric outcome for the selection of women suitable for confinement in low-intervention units.
Methods: Retrospective analyses were performed on data from 2900 women enrolled in the Western Australian Pregnancy Cohort Study and 1353 women managed at a midwifery-based birth center. A combination of the principal predictors of obstetric outcome, incorporating a previously published scoring system and various clinical features, was used to exclude high-risk cases at 18 weeks' and 36 weeks' gestation. Stepwise multivariate logistic regression analyses of the remaining pregnancies then produced a low-risk scoring system.
Results: This system predicted a 55% chance of an uncomplicated delivery in a midwifery-based setting after allocating 54% of women to the low-risk category. It predicted an 82% chance of an uncomplicated delivery in a primary medical care setting with the allocation of 84% of women as low risk.
Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that adding induction and augmentation of labor, together with low pelvic instrumental delivery, to the treatment options in a low-intervention unit would raise the rate of successful confinement within the unit from 55% to 82%. Our scoring system now requires prospective evaluation to further assess its clinical value. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0029-7844 1873-233X |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)81435-4 |