Prospective Study Investigating Routine Usage of Ultrasonography as the Initial Diagnostic Modality for the Evaluation of Children Sustaining Blunt Abdominal Trauma

In this prospective study, 217 children sustaining blunt abdominal trauma were initially evaluated with ultrasonography (US) and those with any abnormal ultrasonographic findings were further evaluated with computed tomography. Results of ultrasonographic examination were normal in 157 children and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care Infection, and Critical Care, 1997-04, Vol.42 (4), p.626-628
Hauptverfasser: Akgur, Feza M., Aktug, Tanju, Olguner, Mustafa, Kovanlikaya, Arzu, Hakguder, Gulce
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In this prospective study, 217 children sustaining blunt abdominal trauma were initially evaluated with ultrasonography (US) and those with any abnormal ultrasonographic findings were further evaluated with computed tomography. Results of ultrasonographic examination were normal in 157 children and showed abnormalities such as free intraperitoneal fluid (FIF), intra-abdominal organ injury, and intrapleural fluid in 60 children. Computed tomographic examination of the 42 children with organ injury, the seven children with minimal FIF of no definite source, and the three children with intrapleural fluid revealed findings consistent with ultrasonographic findings. Computed tomographic examination of the eight children with more than minimal FIF of no definite source detected by US showed the source as liver injury in one and spleen injuries in two patients. The source of FIF could not be identified with computed tomography in five patients. After clinic follow-up examination, one of these five patients was operated on for abdominal tenderness, fever, and air-fluid levels detected on plain abdominal radiographs, and duodenal perforation was encountered. Clinical courses of the patients with normal ultrasonographic findings were uneventful. We conclude that US, aside from being a screening tool, is alone sufficient in the evaluation of the majority of the children sustaining blunt abdominal trauma. Although this is a preliminary study with further work needed to be done, we propose that further evaluation with computed tomography should be performed on those children in whom more than minimal FIF of no definite source is detected with US.
ISSN:0022-5282
1529-8809
DOI:10.1097/00005373-199704000-00007