Retrograde tubal embryo transfer in natural cycle in-vitro fertilization
Two modes of embryo transfer, uterine and tubal, were compared following natural cycle in-vitro fertilization (IVF). Only patients with patent Fallopian tubes were included in the study. Tubal embryo transfer was performed by retrograde tubal cannulation without analgesia on an outpatient basis. Tub...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Human reproduction (Oxford) 1997-03, Vol.12 (3), p.484-486 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Two modes of embryo transfer, uterine and tubal, were compared following natural cycle in-vitro fertilization (IVF). Only patients with patent Fallopian tubes were included in the study. Tubal embryo transfer was performed by retrograde tubal cannulation without analgesia on an outpatient basis. Tubal transfer conferred no benefit compared with uterine transfer in male factor infertility with positive fertilization (pregnancy rates of 15.8% in both groups). Although tubal embryo transfer in the patients with unexplained infertility improved the pregnancy rates from 7.8% in uterine transfer (5/64) to 17.6% in the tubal transfer group (13/74), this improvement was not statistically significant. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0268-1161 1460-2350 |
DOI: | 10.1093/humrep/12.3.484 |