Quantitative reverse transcriptase-PCR amplification of cytokine mRNA in liver biopsy specimens using a non-competitive method

Reverse transcriptase‐PCR (RT‐PCR) amplification of mRNA is often the only technique able to detect expression of cytokine mRNA In small samples. The aim of this work was to investigate the utility of a non‐competitive RT‐PCR which used external standards to quantitate TNF‐α mRNA in liver biopsy spe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Immunology and cell biology 1997-04, Vol.75 (2), p.142-147
Hauptverfasser: Bishop, GA, Rokahr, KL, Lowes, M, McGuinness, PH, Napoli, J, Decruz, DJ, Wong, W‐Y, McCaughan, GW
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Reverse transcriptase‐PCR (RT‐PCR) amplification of mRNA is often the only technique able to detect expression of cytokine mRNA In small samples. The aim of this work was to investigate the utility of a non‐competitive RT‐PCR which used external standards to quantitate TNF‐α mRNA in liver biopsy specimens from liver transplant patients. It involved removal of aliquots from the PCR reaction at successive cycles, followed by dot‐blotting of the samples onto nylon membrane and hybridization with a radioactively‐labelled internal probe. Phosphorimage analysis of the labelled membranes allowed quantitation of the relative amount of PCR product at successive cycles. Plots of log(counts) versus cycle number showed straight lines in the exponential phase of amplification. The slopes of these lines showed the efficiency of amplification, which ranged from 76 to 87% for liver biopsy samples. Estimation of liver biopsy levels of TNF‐α in two separate PCR amplifications showed low inter‐assay variability (r2 = 0.98), Comparison of two separate cDNA syntheses also showed good correlation (r2 = 0.81, P < 0.0001), although not as good as for the PCR alone. This shows that variation in efficiency of cDNA synthesis is likely to contribute as much or more to variability of the analysis as variations in PCR amplification.
ISSN:0818-9641
1440-1711
DOI:10.1038/icb.1997.19