Would you trust a surrogate respondent?

Would you trust a surrogate respondent?

Gluud and Krogsgaard recommend that the use of surrogate respondents be restricted to certain well-defined situations, and indicate that improper use of such respondents will not enhance the reputation of clinical epidemiological research.

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Lancet (British edition) 1997-03, Vol.349 (9053), p.665-666
Hauptverfasser: Gluud, Christian, Krogsgaard, Kim
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Clinical Trials as Topic
Data Collection
Epidemiologic Methods
Epidemiology
Humans
Medical research
Medical screening
Questionnaires
Responses
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Gluud and Krogsgaard recommend that the use of surrogate respondents be restricted to certain well-defined situations, and indicate that improper use of such respondents will not enhance the reputation of clinical epidemiological research.
ISSN:0140-6736
1474-547X
DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)60131-6