A sensitive and specific serologic test for detection of Campylobacter pylori infection
Campylobacter pylori has been associated with gastritis, duodenal ulcer, gastric ulcer, and nonulcer dyspepsia. Evidence that C. pylori may be the causative agent or at least a major contributory factor in peptic ulcer disease has generated intense interest in the development of reliable methods for...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Gastroenterology (New York, N.Y. 1943) N.Y. 1943), 1989-04, Vol.96 (4), p.1004-1008 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Campylobacter pylori has been associated with gastritis, duodenal ulcer, gastric ulcer, and nonulcer dyspepsia. Evidence that C. pylori may be the causative agent or at least a major contributory factor in peptic ulcer disease has generated intense interest in the development of reliable methods for detecting C. pylori infections. We have developed a specific and sensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) that detects serum immunoglobulin G antibodies directed against high molecular weight cell-associated proteins (HM-CAP) of C. pylori. In a blinded fashion we tested sera from 300 individuals and found that all of 147 HM-CAP ELISA-negative individuals were also negative for C. pylori, as documented by a negative urea breath test; also, 151 of 153 C. pylori-positive (by urea breath test) individuals were HM-CAP ELISA-positive. Campylobacter pylori was cultured from the two ELISA-negative but infected patients and these isolates did possess HM-CAP antigens, showing that these two individuals had failed to seroconvert. Thus, the specificity and positive predictive value of the HM-CAP ELISA were each 100%; the sensitivity of the assay was 98.7%, and the negative predictive value was 98.6%. The HM-CAP ELISA and the urea breath test both proved valuable for detecting C. pylori infection, the urea breath test being a more direct method whereas the ELISA is less expensive and easier to perform. Furthermore, the results of a serologic test such as the HM-CAP ELISA would not be influenced by recent ingestion of bismuth compounds or antimicrobial therapy, which might suppress C. pylori and cause a transient false-negative result in the urea breath test. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0016-5085 1528-0012 |
DOI: | 10.1016/0016-5085(89)91616-8 |