Recognition of depression by internists in primary care: a comparison of internist and "gold standard" psychiatric assessments
In an effort to elucidate the process of internists' recognition of depression in primary care settings, a comparison of internist and "gold standard" psychiatric assessments of patients was undertaken in a rural primary care practice over a 15-month period. Clinical characteristics a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM 1989-01, Vol.4 (1), p.7-13 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In an effort to elucidate the process of internists' recognition of depression in primary care settings, a comparison of internist and "gold standard" psychiatric assessments of patients was undertaken in a rural primary care practice over a 15-month period. Clinical characteristics and diagnoses, global assessments of psychosocial stress, and two aspects of chief-complaint presentation style, clarity and somatization, were recorded by the internists for each patient, who was independently assessed by a psychiatrist for the presence of any specific depressive disorder by structured interview. Internists correctly labeled 57% of the interview-assessed depressives as depressed; 13% of patients with "no psychiatric disorder" were assessed as depressed by internists. Clinical and demographic characteristics of the "false-negative" and "false-positive" internists' diagnoses were examined to clarify how internists think of "depression" in the primary care context. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0884-8734 1525-1497 |
DOI: | 10.1007/BF02596483 |