Comparing clinical staging plus transrectal ultrasound with surgical-pathologic staging of prostate cancer

Twenty-five men with histopathologic diagnosis of prostatic adenocarcinoma were staged utilizing traditional staging modalities and transrectal ultrasound of the prostate (TRUSP). A comparison was then done with surgical-pathologic stage. TRUSP accurately predicted the local extent of disease in 84...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) N.J.), 1989-02, Vol.33 (2), p.103-105
Hauptverfasser: Perrapato, Scott D., Carothers, George G., Maatman, Thomas J., Soechtig, C.Eugene
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Twenty-five men with histopathologic diagnosis of prostatic adenocarcinoma were staged utilizing traditional staging modalities and transrectal ultrasound of the prostate (TRUSP). A comparison was then done with surgical-pathologic stage. TRUSP accurately predicted the local extent of disease in 84 percent of patients, while digital rectal examination understaged in 64 percent of patients. TRUSP is a valuable adjunct to staging prostate cancer prior to definitive therapy.
ISSN:0090-4295
1527-9995
DOI:10.1016/0090-4295(89)90004-6