Banff schema for grading liver allograft rejection: An international consensus document

A panel of recognized experts in liver transplantation pathology, hepatology, and surgery was convened for the purpose of developing a consensus document for the grading of acute liver allograft rejection that is scientifically correct, simple, and reproducible and clinically useful. Over a period o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) Md.), 1997-03, Vol.25 (3), p.658-663
Hauptverfasser: DEMETRIS, A. J, BATTS, K. P, KEMNITZ, J, KOUKOULIS, G, LEE, R. G, LEWIN, K. J, LUDWIG, J, MARKIN, R. S, PETROVIC, L. M, PHILLIPS, M. J, PORTMANN, B, RAKELA, J, DHILLON, A. P, RANDHAWA, P, REINHOLT, F. P, REYNES, M, ROBERT, M, SCHLITT, H, SOLEZ, K, SNOVER, D, TASKINEN, E, THUNG, S. N, TILLERY, G. W, FERRELL, L, WIESNER, R. H, WIGHT, D. G. D, WILLIAMS, J. W, YAMABE, H, FUNG, J, GELLER, S. A, HART, J, HAYRY, P, HOFMANN, W. J, HUBSCHER, S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A panel of recognized experts in liver transplantation pathology, hepatology, and surgery was convened for the purpose of developing a consensus document for the grading of acute liver allograft rejection that is scientifically correct, simple, and reproducible and clinically useful. Over a period of 6 months pertinent issues were discussed via electronic communication media and a consensus conference was held in Banff, Canada in the summer of 1995. Based on previously published data and the combined experience of the group, the panel agreed on a common nomenclature and a set of histopathological criteria for the grading of acute liver allograft rejection, and a preferred method of reporting. Adoption of this internationally accepted, common grading system by scientific journals will minimize the problems associated with the use of multiple different local systems. Modifications of this working document to incorporate chronic rejection are expected in the future.
ISSN:0270-9139
1527-3350
DOI:10.1002/hep.510250328