Zero-time Prehospital IV

Advances in prehospital stabilization and resuscitation of traumatized victims continue to have an impact on morbidity and mortality. Certain aspects of Advanced Trauma Life Support still remain controversial. Recent reports have questioned the usefulness of IVʼs started in the prehospital phase bot...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of trauma 1989-01, Vol.29 (1), p.84-86
Hauptverfasser: OʼGORMAN, MICHAEL, TRABULSY, PHILIP, PILCHER, DAVID B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Advances in prehospital stabilization and resuscitation of traumatized victims continue to have an impact on morbidity and mortality. Certain aspects of Advanced Trauma Life Support still remain controversial. Recent reports have questioned the usefulness of IVʼs started in the prehospital phase both because of delay in transport and because of the actual or theoretical lack of adequate volume infusion during transport.If IV lines can be started while an accident victim is en route to the hospital with no delay in transport, then much of the argument against prehospital IVʼs becomes irrelevant.From October 1985 through November 1986 we prospectively studied IV access attempts in 350 consecutive patients. Overall IVʼs started at the scene were 77% successful (n = 70) and en route 81% (n = 213) of attempts were successful. Of those with BP < 100 mm Hg, there were 66% successful on-scene attempts and 72% successful en-route attempts.Protocols for IV administration in non-trapped patients should initiate IV access only en route to the hospital while the ambulance is moving. Even if delay at the scene is minimal, it is not possible to justify any delay, since IVʼs can be successfully instituted en route.
ISSN:0022-5282
1529-8809
DOI:10.1097/00005373-198901000-00017