One balloon, one stent: An effective cost-containment strategy for elective stent deployment

A cost‐containment strategy to reduce stent procedure‐related resources utilizing an integrated system comprised of a Stablizer™ guide wire, a Brite‐Tip™ guiding catheter, and a single Titan™ balloon catheter for both lesion predilatation and poststent deployment was compared to a conventional strat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis 1997-01, Vol.40 (1), p.17-20
Hauptverfasser: Rocha-Singh, Krishna J., Trask, Robert V., Lucore, Charles L., Horn, Susan G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A cost‐containment strategy to reduce stent procedure‐related resources utilizing an integrated system comprised of a Stablizer™ guide wire, a Brite‐Tip™ guiding catheter, and a single Titan™ balloon catheter for both lesion predilatation and poststent deployment was compared to a conventional strategy utilizing a nonintegrated guide wire, guiding catheter, and balloon components. Both groups were comparable with respect to demographics, number of lesions stented, and stents deployed per lesion. No differences in lesion length or pre‐ and poststent minimal luminal diameter were observed. Balloon use was significantly reduced using the integrated strategy when compared to the conventional strategy (1.3 ± 0.5 vs. 2.1 ± 1.1; P < 0.01); overall nonstent‐related resource utilization was significantly reduced ($747 ± $401 vs. $1,093 ± $467; P < 0.01). Procedural success rates were identical in both groups (100%), and no patient sustained subacute stent thrombosis or required target vessel revascularization at 1 mo follow‐up. We conclude that the use of a single Titan™ balloon catheter as part of an integrated cost‐containment strategy for both lesion predilatation and poststent deployment results in considerable cost savings while maintaining high procedural and clinical success rates. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 40:17–20, 1997. © 1997 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
ISSN:0098-6569
1097-0304
DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0304(199701)40:1<17::AID-CCD5>3.0.CO;2-E