Subduction erosion along the Middle America convergent margin
‘Subduction erosion’ has been invoked to explain material missing from some continents along convergent margins 1 . It has been suggested that this form of tectonic erosion removes continental material at the front of the margin or along the underside of the upper (continental) plate 2 , 3 , 4 . Fro...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nature (London) 2000-04, Vol.404 (6779), p.748-752 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | ‘Subduction erosion’ has been invoked to explain material missing from some continents along convergent margins
1
. It has been suggested that this form of tectonic erosion removes continental material at the front of the margin or along the underside of the upper (continental) plate
2
,
3
,
4
. Frontal erosion is interpreted from disrupted topography at the base of a slope and is most evident in the wake of subducting seamounts
5
,
6
. In contrast, structures resulting from erosion at the base of a continental plate are seldom recognized in seismic reflection images because such images typically have poor resolution at distances greater than ∼ 5 km from the trench axis. Basal erosion from seamounts and ridges has been inferred
7
,
8
, but few large subducted bodies—let alone the eroded base of the upper plate—are imaged convincingly. From seismic images we identify here two mechanisms of basal erosion: erosion by seamount tunnelling and removal of large rock lenses of a distending upper plate. Seismic cross-sections from Costa Rica to Nicaragua indicate that erosion may extend along much of the Middle America convergent margin. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0028-0836 1476-4687 |
DOI: | 10.1038/35008046 |