Calibration verification of the International Normalized Ratio

The International Normalized Ratio (INR) system for reporting the prothrombin time (PT) is essentially a calibration activity intended to standardize PT reporting across various reagent/instrument systems. However, complete standardization of PT reporting through the INR has been difficult to achiev...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of clinical pathology 1996-12, Vol.106 (6), p.786-794
Hauptverfasser: CRITCHFIELD, G. C, BENNETT, S. T, SWAIM, W. R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The International Normalized Ratio (INR) system for reporting the prothrombin time (PT) is essentially a calibration activity intended to standardize PT reporting across various reagent/instrument systems. However, complete standardization of PT reporting through the INR has been difficult to achieve for a variety of reasons, including inaccurate assignment of thromboplastin International Sensitivity Indexes (ISIs) and specific (local) reagent/instrument effects. Until now, the individual laboratory has not been able to easily verify the accuracy of its INR. Using standard lyophilized plasmas with INR values assigned against IRP RBT/90 rabbit thromboplastin, the authors present a method that allows a laboratory to locally verify its range of accuracy for the INR. The method is illustrated on a single coagulometer with two thromboplastin lots of differing sensitivity (Pacific Hemostasis Thromboplastin-DS and Thromboplastin-D from rabbit sources, with respective International Sensitivity Indexes of 1.20 and 1.97). In this illustration of the method, the accuracy of Thromboplastin-DS was superior to that of Thromboplastin-D. Interpretation of the data and cautions regarding the use of standard plasmas for calibration verification are discussed. Using this method, a reportable range of accuracy at a given error tolerance can be established locally for INR measurements within a laboratory. Laboratories of any size can apply this method to study the accuracy of their INR reagent/instrument systems, thus performing calibration verification. When used in conjunction with assessments of assay precision, this method can help laboratories to select better reagent/instrument systems and thereby produce more accurate and more clinically meaningful INR results.
ISSN:0002-9173
1943-7722
DOI:10.1093/ajcp/106.6.786