Evaluation of femoropopliteal arteries with duplex ultrasound after angioplasty. Can we predict results at one year?
To determine if Duplex ultrasound (DUS) 1 day after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) is prognostic for haemodynamic and clinical results at 1 year. Prospective study. Thirty-four femoropopliteal artery segments were treated with PTA. The peak systolic velocity ratio (PSV ratio = PSV in st...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery 1996-11, Vol.12 (4), p.418-423 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To determine if Duplex ultrasound (DUS) 1 day after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) is prognostic for haemodynamic and clinical results at 1 year.
Prospective study.
Thirty-four femoropopliteal artery segments were treated with PTA. The peak systolic velocity ratio (PSV ratio = PSV in stenosis: PSV in normal segment) was determined with DUS before PTA, 1 day after PTA and 1 year after PTA. Clinical results were assessed with the SVS/ISCVS (Society for Vascular Surgery/International Society for CardioVascular Surgery) results classification.
A 1 year, clinical benefit from PTA was seen in 16 of 25 patients (64%) and haemodynamic improvement in 20 of 34 treated segments (59%). With DUS three residual stenoses were found 1 day after PTA; all occluded within 1 year. Segments with good DUS results after PTA showed haemodynamic deterioration in 30%. Clinical improvement was seen in most patients with DUS improvement, whereas no change or deterioration was found in patients with both good and poor DUS results at 1 year.
Residual stenosis on DUS 1 day after PTA is prognostic for failure within 1 year. However, good DUS results after PTA cannot predict haemodynamic success. Haemodynamic success at 1 year does not imply clinical success. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1078-5884 1532-2165 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S1078-5884(96)80006-2 |