Commentary: a controlled trial of nurse practitioners in intensive care
In this issue of Pediatrics (pages 1143-1148), there is an article by Mitchell-DiCenso et al entitled "A Controlled Trial of Nurse Practitioners in Neonatal Intensive Care." The clinical nurse specialists/nurse practitioners (CNS/NPs) as well as the controls (pediatric residents) were supe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pediatrics (Evanston) 1996-12, Vol.98 (6 Pt 1), p.1201-1201 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In this issue of Pediatrics (pages 1143-1148), there is an article by Mitchell-DiCenso et al entitled "A Controlled Trial of Nurse Practitioners in Neonatal Intensive Care." The clinical nurse specialists/nurse practitioners (CNS/NPs) as well as the controls (pediatric residents) were supervised by neonatologists or neonatal trainees. The CNS/NPs provided care for their patients during the day while the residents provided 24 hours per day care for their patients and evening and night coverage for the CNS/NPs' patients. The authors measured diverse outcome variables including mortality, neonatal complications, quality of care, parental satisfaction, costs, etc, and concluded that the CNS/NPs and pediatric residents were similar with respect to all tested measures of performance. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0031-4005 1098-4275 |
DOI: | 10.1542/peds.98.6.1201 |