Positron emission tomography with F‐18‐fluorodeoxyglucose to evaluate the results of hepatic chemoembolization

BACKGROUND Positron emission tomography (PET) using F‐18‐fluorodeoxyglucose (18FDG) is an imaging modality allowing direct evaluation of cellular glucose metabolism. The purpose of this study was to examine the role of 18FDG‐PET in monitoring chemoembolization therapy of patients with liver metastas...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer 1996-11, Vol.78 (10), p.2216-2222
Hauptverfasser: Vitola, João V., Delbeke, Dominique, Meranze, Steven G., Mazer, Murray J., Pinson, C. Wright
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BACKGROUND Positron emission tomography (PET) using F‐18‐fluorodeoxyglucose (18FDG) is an imaging modality allowing direct evaluation of cellular glucose metabolism. The purpose of this study was to examine the role of 18FDG‐PET in monitoring chemoembolization therapy of patients with liver metastases from adenocarcinoma. METHODS Thirty‐four hepatic lesions in 4 patients were evaluated with 18FDG‐PET before and 2–3 months after interventional therapy. All patients underwent transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. A total of nine PET studies were performed. Semiquantitative measurement of the metabolic activity of the lesions was performed using the standard uptake value (SUV) of 18FDG. Comparison was performed between sequential PET scans using Student's t test for paired data analysis. The PET findings were also compared with tumor marker levels measured at the time of the PET scans. RESULTS Twenty‐five of 34 lesions had decreased 18FDG uptake (SUV = 8 ± 2 vs. 3 ± 1; P < 0.00001), as expected in successful tumor chemoembolization. These findings were associated with a significant decrease in serum tumor marker levels (86 ± 4%; P < 0.05) after treatment. However, there were 3 new lesions, and 6 of the 34 lesions demonstrated persistent or increased 18FDG uptake after treatment (SUV = 8 ± 2 vs. 13 ± 3; P < 0.05), consistent with the presence of residual viable tumor. These findings led to further interventional therapy in all patients. CONCLUSIONS 18FDG‐PET allows monitoring of response to treatment with hepatic chemoembolization in patients with liver metastases from adenocarcinoma. PET is a useful diagnostic tool and has the potential to be used to guide further interventional therapy. Cancer 1996;78:2216‐22.
ISSN:0008-543X
1097-0142
DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19961115)78:10<2216::AID-CNCR25>3.0.CO;2-0