Assessment of coronary angioplasty by an automated digital angiographic method

Digital subtraction coronary angiograms (DSA) of 63 patients who had undergone coronary angioplasty (PTCA) for a total of 73 lesions were analyzed with an automated border-detecting computer program capable of simultaneous geometric and densitometric cross-sectional area estimation. The computer measurements were compared with visual interpretation of the 35 mm cineangiograms. The results indicated that visual reports of cineangiograms tend to overestimate the pre-PTCA diameter percent stenosis and to underestimate the post-PTCA residual stenosis in comparison with the computer ( p < 0.001 in both cases). There was good agreement between geometric and densitometric area percent stenoses calculated by the program on the pre-PTCA digital angiograms ( r = 0.82, p < 0.001, mean of their differences = −0.2 with standard deviation = 6.1). Following PTCA, however, important discrepancies between the two methods existed ( r = 0.71, p < 0.001, mean of their differences = 1.0 with standard deviation = 18.6). Following PTCA (but not pre-PTCA), densitometric evaluation demonstrated a significantly greater mean coefficient of variation between different views (69%) than did the geometric evaluation on the same views (24%). We conclude (1) that visual interpretation of cine coronary angiograms compares poorly with quantitative methods for both the selection of PTCA candidates and the assessment of the results; (2) that the geometric and densitometric characteristics do not agree in describing the degree of post-PTCA residual stenosis; and (3) that after angioplasty, important discrepancies between densitometric evaluation in different views are observed.