Evaluation of a reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay for detecting St. Louis encephalitis virus using field-collected mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae)

A reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay (RT-PCR) was compared with a tissue culture assay (TC) and an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) to detect St. Louis encephalitis virus (SLEV) in mosquito pools. Overall, 1,725 mosquito pools with a low viral prevalence (3.3%-5.0%) were tested. The compa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of medical entomology 1996, Vol.33 (1), p.123-127
Hauptverfasser: NAWROCKI, S. J, RANDLE, Y. H, VODKIN, M. H, SIEGEL, J. P, NOVAK, R. J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay (RT-PCR) was compared with a tissue culture assay (TC) and an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) to detect St. Louis encephalitis virus (SLEV) in mosquito pools. Overall, 1,725 mosquito pools with a low viral prevalence (3.3%-5.0%) were tested. The comparison of the EIA to TC showed that the EIA was 0.947 sensitive, 0.988 specific, and 0.987 accurate. Comparison of RT-PCR to TC showed that the RT-PCR was 0.947 sensitive, 0.980 specific, and 0.979 accurate. Comparison of the RT-PCR to EIA showed that the RT-PCR was 0.878 sensitive, 0.987 specific, and 0.982 accurate. Because of speed, accuracy, and cost, either the RT-PCR or the EIA is recommended as the primary screen. RT-PCR has an advantage over EIA, because the amplified product contains sequence information which can confirm its identity. TC, EIA, or both can be applied as a 2nd assay for the confirmation of samples suspected as positives by the RT-PCR.
ISSN:0022-2585
1938-2928
DOI:10.1093/jmedent/33.1.123