Evaluation of a reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay for detecting St. Louis encephalitis virus using field-collected mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae)
A reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay (RT-PCR) was compared with a tissue culture assay (TC) and an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) to detect St. Louis encephalitis virus (SLEV) in mosquito pools. Overall, 1,725 mosquito pools with a low viral prevalence (3.3%-5.0%) were tested. The compa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of medical entomology 1996, Vol.33 (1), p.123-127 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | A reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay (RT-PCR) was compared with a tissue culture assay (TC) and an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) to detect St. Louis encephalitis virus (SLEV) in mosquito pools. Overall, 1,725 mosquito pools with a low viral prevalence (3.3%-5.0%) were tested. The comparison of the EIA to TC showed that the EIA was 0.947 sensitive, 0.988 specific, and 0.987 accurate. Comparison of RT-PCR to TC showed that the RT-PCR was 0.947 sensitive, 0.980 specific, and 0.979 accurate. Comparison of the RT-PCR to EIA showed that the RT-PCR was 0.878 sensitive, 0.987 specific, and 0.982 accurate. Because of speed, accuracy, and cost, either the RT-PCR or the EIA is recommended as the primary screen. RT-PCR has an advantage over EIA, because the amplified product contains sequence information which can confirm its identity. TC, EIA, or both can be applied as a 2nd assay for the confirmation of samples suspected as positives by the RT-PCR. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-2585 1938-2928 |
DOI: | 10.1093/jmedent/33.1.123 |